对火星轨道变化问题的最后解释（1/1）
作者君在作品相关中其实已经解释过这个问题。
不过仍然有人质疑——“你说得太含糊了”，“火星轨道的变化比你想象要大得多！”
那好吧，既然作者君的简单解释不够有力，那咱们就看看严肃的东西，反正这本书写到现在，嚷嚷着本书bug一大堆，用初高中物理在书中挑刺的人也不少。
以下是文章内容：
long-terentricityofentricityorinclinationinanyorbitaleleurssourrsisbecauseweknowfrourateseentricitiesandinclinationsoftheterrestrialplanets，especiallyofess)，whereweshowraworbitaleleuurateenough，ever，sincetheeccentricityofjupiter(0.05)isordingtooneofthebasicpropertiesofsyuracyofnuurateintegrationwithastepsizeof0.125d(1/64oftheentricitiesandorbitalinclinationsfortheinnerfourplanetsintheinitialandfinalpartoftheintegrationn+1isshowninfig.xpected，thecharacterofthevariationofplanetaryorbitaleleentricity，sispartlybecausetheorbitaltientricitiesandinclinationsofentricityandinclinationofearthinn+ig.5，thedarkareashowsthatatthetientricityandinclinationofearthonlychangesslightlyovertheentireperiodcoveredbythen+snearlyregulartrendisqualitativelythesaaletti&sentricitiesofvenusandearthcanbedisturbedeasilybyjupiterandsaturn，heotherhand，theseentricitiesandinclinations(fig.13)showthisverylong-terentricityandinclinationsisanticipatedinthesecularperturbationtheoryconstructedbykozai(1962).
thelongitudeofthenodeofplutoreferredtothelongitudeofthenodeofneptune，θ3=ΩpΩn，circulatesandtheperiodofthiscirculationisequaltotheperiodofθnθ3becoentricitybecoentricitybecoentricityofjupiter)，sincethedisturbancecausedbyjovianplanetsisaforcedoscillationhavinganaentricity，forexampleo(ej)0.05，isfarfromsufficienttoprovokeinsweassumethatthepresentwidedynamicalseparationamongterrestrialplanets(>26rh)isprobablyoneofthemostsignificantconditionsformaintainingthestabilityoftheplanetarysystemovera109-yrtime-detailedanalysisoftherelationshipbetweendynamicaldistancebetweenplanetsandtheinstabilitytime-scaleofsolarsystemplanetarymotionisnowon-going.
althoughournumericalintegrationsspanthelifetimeofthesolarsystem，thenusnecessarytoperformmoreandmorenumericalintegrationstoconfirmandexamineindetailthelong-termstabilityofourplanetarydynamics.
这只是作者君参考的一篇文章，关于太阳系的稳定性。
当然还有其他论文，不过其它论文下载一篇要九美元，作者君下不起，就不贴上来了。